🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.